In the spring most BC municipalities published, on their websites, the campaign finance disclosure documents from the November 2008 elections. While I glanced at them then, I was always a bit curious and I resolved to take a closer look at those for the North Vancouver City Council when I had a bit of time. I finally did this week. There are two main types of disclosure documents -- those submitted by the candidates themselves and those prepared by "Campaign Organizers" -- organizations working to influence the outcome of the election. These are usually one of political parties, trade unions, environmental organizations, corporate groups, etc. There were two such campaign organizers working in North Vancouver -- the Canadian Labour Congress and the BC Branch of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE BC). Together they supported 250 candidates across the province, spending $153,152 and $69,198 respectively. For the analysis below I allocated 1/250th of these amounts to each of the candidates they supported in the election. The candidates themselves are required to list all groups or individuals donating over $100, and whether they are from an individual, business, unincorporated organization, non-profit organization, union, or other. All the contributions listed in the report were either from individuals, business, or trade unions. The overall summary looks like this:
| Last Name | Self | Individuals | Companies | Trade Unions | Total |
| Bookham | $7,461 | $1,650 | $9,111 | ||
| Clark | $1,473 | $1,425 | $350 | $2,839 | $6,087 |
| Fearnley | $1,564 | $1,100 | $1,775 | $4,439 | |
| Heilman | $7,769 | $100 | $7,869 | ||
| Heywood | $4,279 | $1,700 | $5,979 | ||
| Keating | $1,650 | $1,243 | $13,550 | $6,089 | $22,532 |
| Leia | $735 | $300 | $3,048 | $4,839 | $8,922 |
| Leonard | $281 | $9,965 | $1,813 | $12,059 | |
| MacIntyre | $2,686 | $1,589 | $4,275 | ||
| Mussatto | $575 | $300 | $16,825 | $7,339 | $25,039 |
| Neilson | $2,741 | $600 | $500 | $2,839 | $6,680 |
| Rabbani | $0 | ||||
| Schechter | $3,930 | $8,425 | $7,339 | $19,694 | |
| Sostad | $0 | ||||
| Trentadue | $1,535 | $2,600 | $5,589 | $9,724 | |
| Vickery | $0 | ||||
| Total | $31,214 | $23,848 | $48,886 | $38,465 | $142,413 |
Altogether nearly $26.00 was spent for every vote cast (5,540) in the election. Sources from each of the four areas was roughly comparable -- 22% from the candidates themselves, 17% from other individuals, 34% from companies and 27% from trade unions. From the summary it seems there was a continuum, with Joe Heilman and Councillor Bookham largely self-financing their campaigns to Ivan Leonard who had many individual supporters, through to Mayor Mussatto and Cheryl Leia who relied heavily on support from companies and trade unions. This can be visualized with a network graph, produced by a tool called graphviz. In the (large) diagram below, candidates are marked by rectangles, which are roughly congruent with their total amount of external money raised, companies are circles, trade unions are triangles and individuals are small house shapes. Thicker lines mean more money than thinner lines.
I find these numbers troubling. I have no problem with organizations being involved and contributing to election campaigns, but not to this extent. When you only look at candidates who won a seat, 69% of the money raised came from companies and trade unions -- only 11% came from individuals. The remainder (21%) came from the candidates themselves. I don't know if this is reflective of candidates' ability or interest in soliciting donations from individuals, or general public apathy, but it's not indicative of a healthy democratic process. More about this later.

